US clean energy rollback would be a strategic blunder

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "US clean energy rollback would be a strategic blunder" has 1311 words across 61 sentences, which will take approximately 6 - 11 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "US clean energy rollback would be a strategic blunder" was covered 20 hours ago by Financial Times, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Financial Times' news outlet?

Financial Times is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1888 that covers mostly markets, finance, and investing news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 4 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28745077</li><li>URL: https://swalz.beamstart.com/news/us-clean-energy-rollback-would-17473946572808</li></ul>

Financial Times 20h ago

US clean energy rollback would be a strategic blunder - Financial Times

Quick Summary:

But US energy demand is set for extraordinary growth over the next decade and beyond, driven in part by surging expansion of data centres to power artificial intelligence.

Given China’s current domination of so much of the clean energy supply chain, that provision alone could render most projects ineligible.

While Donald Trump racks up investment deals (and a new plane) on his tour of the Gulf, Republicans in Washington are working to implement his pledge to destroy the “Green New Scam” of low-carbon energy policy.